Souveraineté sur Pulau Ligitan et Pulau Sipadan (ZndonésielMalaisie), arrêt, C. I. J. found tlieir claims to the islands of Ligitan and Sipadan. Penelitian lebih lanjut mengenai masalah kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan membawa kasus ini ke Mahkamah Internasional adalah putusan politik . PENGARUH PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH INTERNASIONAL TERHADAP KASUS SIPADAN DAN LIGITAN DALAM PENERAPAN BATAS WILAYAH.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||22 August 2010|
|PDF File Size:||12.81 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.84 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Sovereignty over Ligitan and Sipadan Islands Indonesia v.
Kasus Indonesia vs Malaysia by claudia hartono on Prezi
International Court of Justice. The problem of this research is how the effect of International Court of Justice decision in case of Sipadan and Ligitan between Indonesia and Malaysia to forming national Law concerning regional boundary of the State. This page was last edited on 11 Septemberat Retrieved 7 February In order to solve the problems above, the writer conducted Library Study for the data collecting. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Collections Skripsi Sarjana .
Sources of data used in this study are secondary data, obtained through books, internet sites, journals, and others related to this research. Archived from the original on 5 March This research tries to explain the diplomacy of Indonesia and Malaysia as well as the settlement of ownership of Sipadan island and Ligitan ligitaj.
Retrieved from ” https: ICJ awarded both islands to Malaysia based on “effective occupation”. Ligitan and Sipadan are two small islands located in the Celebes Sea off the southeastern coast of the Malaysian state of Sabah.
This research is kind of research literature study. The uncertainty of state boundaries and territorial status is often a source of dispute among nations adjacent or adjacent.
But as Malaysia’s predecessor, Great Britainsignificantly developed the islands compared to Indonesia’s predecessor, the Netherlandsespecially after Malaysia’s formation as a nation the court using this as the main reason decided to award the islands to Siapdan based on their “effective occupation”.
Ligitan and Sipadan dispute
Which is where finally the judges of the International Court of Justice finally decided Sipadan and Ligitan Islands became the jurisdiction of Malaysia. The dispute began in and was largely resolved by the International Court of Justice ICJ inwhich opined that both of the islands belonged to Malaysia.
Diplomasi Indonesia-Malaysia dalam Kasus Kepemilikan Pulau Sipadan dan Ligitan
Archived from the original on 9 April The dispute arises from the application of different principles to the determination of the boundaries of the continental shelf among neighboring countries, causing a region of overlap which can cause disputes. International Court of Justice cases Territorial disputes of Indonesia Territorial disputes of Malaysia Islands of Sabah in case law in Indonesia in Malaysia Indonesia—Malaysia border Indonesia—Malaysia relations in international relations.
But with a far-sighted vision, leaders of both countries have taken a wise stance to immediately restore relations and even pioneered the establishment of the ASEAN regional organization in Text Halaman Judul 0HK But, the decision of International court of justice does not have any direct barring to delimitation of continental shelf.
More information and software credits. Archived from the original on 7 February Malaysia however denied the allegation of an agreement between them, maintaining that the islands have always been part of the territory of its state of Sabah.
Views Read Edit View history. Author Lubis, Aan Fourdes. The consideration of the judges of the International Court of Justice in winning Malaysia is based on several factors: The main data sources for this research came from Primary Data and Secondary Data.
Moreover, for data analysis the writer use descriptive qualitative.