Soalan-soalan Lazim Berkaitan Seksyen (a) Akta Keterangan 1. merupakan pindaan terbaru terhadap Akta Keterangan Pada 31 Mei , Pusat Kewartawanan Bebas (CIJ) melancarkan satu e-petisyen. Pindaan Akta Keterangan (Akta ). RM Laws of Malaysia Authoritative Text The Commissioner of Law Revision Malaysia Practicing lawyers, legal. Akta Keterangan, JADUAL. (Seksyen 2 (1)). PINDAAN KEPADA KANUN ACARA JENAYAH. (N.M.B. Bab 6). Seksyen/ peruntukan. 2 (i) . . 6/

Author: Shakakree Shaktigal
Country: Syria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Automotive
Published (Last): 25 January 2012
Pages: 191
PDF File Size: 14.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.97 Mb
ISBN: 430-2-78628-264-8
Downloads: 26803
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Malakasa

The judge in this case noticed that there is none of the types of the secondary evidences suitable with the draft. Moreover, individuals who witness or are involved in criminal incidents react differently.

The reasons for identification evidence being considered unreliable are provided in a number of leading cases.

December | Prima Facie Journey

Mungkin artikel ini tidak akan menggambarkan secara keseluruhan bagaimana maklumat ini diterima, namun artikel ini akan aakta sedikit gambaran bagaimana maklumat sebegini boleh diterima oleh mahkamah atau sebaliknya.

Apakah implikasi pindaan ini terhadap ekonomi negara? Next, I would like to elaborate more on the relevancy of evidence of previous bad character of the accused. Dalam masa sebulan, lebih daripada individu menandatangani petisyen tersebut untuk menyatakan tentangan mereka terhadap pindaan tersebut. Ini perlu bagi memastikan bahawa maklumat yang diterima ada hubungkait dengan soalan yang ditanya.

Secara ringkasnya, motif dan persediaan adalah perkara yang saling berkaitan dalam perlakuan jenayah. Bahagian Pertama Seksyen 8 Akta Keterangan This means the law is now operational.

Newer Posts Older Posts Home. However, the types of the secondary evidences stated above are not exhaustive. As in a rioting case, it is sufficient if only some of the required number of persons have been identified. If the evidence forms part of the res gastae, it is admissible as it is on an entirely different footing to evidence tending to show the previous bad character of an accused person.

Terrel Ag CJ menyatakan:. The right between parties need to be balanced but at the same time the real culprit must not escaped. The judge used the clause 3 of the section which the draft notice is being used to compare with the fair ones.

Antara syarat yang ditetapkan oleh Mahkamah Rayuan adalah. It is clear that BN is in tremendous fears for the next 13th GE. There are few cases which show how the circumstantial evidence being used.

  ASTRALNI PROJEKCE PDF

In common law, the primary evidence is always being relied as the best evidence and that is why in the common law cases, the judge will used the terms of best evidence rather than primary evidence. Sila klik pautan Komuniti Undang-Undang untuk. Just keterwngan ploy from the government to stop non-supporters from attacking them in the media. Section 54 2 starts off with 4 types of question which an accused shall not be asked, and if asked, shall not required to answer.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here So no way we wish to do fresh business in this country. Sering kita akan dengar dialog ini sama ada dalam filem yang membabitkan kes jenayah mahupun dalam penyiasatan pihak polis secara realitinya. It is evidence which under every possible circumstance affords the greater certainty of the facts in question. In conclusion, in order to tender the evidence to the court, it is important for the person to categorize first the evidences that he had and after that, adduce it to the court with the correct path.

About Section A | #StopA

Irene Fernandez, dan ahli akademik ternama seperti Dr. Pemakaian undang-undang Inggeris tidak dilaksanakan di Malaysia tetapi sebaliknya Hakim dalam perbicaraan lebih cenderung membincangkan seksyen 10 dalam statut India di mana ianya pari material mempunyai persamaan dengan seksyen 10 Akta Keterangan Have you ever seen any stern action being taken by authorities against this Utusan paper?

You are commenting using your Facebook account. You choose, I decide!!! Konspirasi ialah satu kombinasi atau persetujuan antara dua orang atau lebih untuk melakukan satu perbuatan yang menyalahi undang-undang atau satu perbuatan yang sah tetapi melalui cara yang salah di sisi undang-undang. Motif dan niat mestilah dibezakan.

Then why the BN goverment is so nervous to charge the internet user to the extent that even someone has used your name to publish a seditious news and yet you will stll be responsibled for the whole lies. Di dalam satu lagi kes, Boota Singh v PP [] 2 Ketreanganmahkamah memutuskan bahawa laporan polis yang lama adalah diterima di bawah seksyen keteranagn untuk membuktikan motif untuk perlakuan jenayah yang selanjutnya.

Perkongsian maklumat yang bebas dan terbuka merupakan asas bagi sebuah sistem demokrasi yang kukuh.

  IBN FAZLAN SEYAHATNAMESI PDF

Oleh itu, jika Seksyen A yang baru ini dilaksanakan, prinsip demokrasi serta kebebasan bersuara rakyat akan terjejas teruk. Hi, We need to oppose this Bill.

Forum Announcement

It is evidence in material form produced before the court so as to enable the court to draw its own conclusion or inference by using its own senses. If you provide a blog, filter the comments. Berhubung kenyataan pertama, tidak terdapat sebarang alasan bagi kegagalan interogator untuk mencatatkan soalan-soalan yang dikemukakan dan jawapan-jawapan yang diterima daripada perayu sama ada ketika disoal siasat atau sejurus selepas itu.

Utusan daily is a biased newspaper owned by UMNOand this was admitted by the chief editor himself. Hasilnya, Seksyen ini mengancam kebebasan bersuara di internet, kketerangan mengancam prinsip asas keadilan, demokrasi dan hak asasi manusia.

Subsections ab and c then relate to the situations in which such questions may be asked. Ia adalah tindakan yang membawa kepada perlakuan jenayah. An evidence given by a witness identifying an accused as keteranga person whom he saw at the scene of the crime will generally be of little value if the witness has not seen the accused since the events in question and is asked to identify him for the first time in the dock, at least when the witness has not by reason of previous knowledge or association, become familiar with the appearance of the accused.

What the hell is that??

Evidence can be in any form which as stated below: Pensabitan perayu yang berdasarkan kepada kedua-dua kenyataan ini, adalah dengan itu sesungguhnya tidak selamat.

The circumstantial evidence is like a strand of rope. However, before I put this discussion to an end, it must be noted that Pindan 54 has no application to character evidence being rendered admissible by other provisions of the Act.

Berdasarkan seksyen ini, sesuatu maklumat yang diberi oleh tertuduh sama ada secara sukarela mahupun tidak atau sama ada merupakan satu pengakuan salah atau meterangan, tidak relevan dalam menetukan keboleterimaannya.